Sign in

A diverse range of shopping, leisure and dining experiences

Understanding the relative value your community places on 'a diverse range of shopping, leisure and dining experiences' and how they experience this attribute in their local area is important to understand the role, function and future of our places. With forecasts predicting growth in hospitality related occupations, and disruptions to the retail sector changing consumer habits, keeping a pulse on how the community views this topic in their local area serves an important role in planning and advocacy. Read more about .id's views on the importance of 'a diverse range of shopping, leisure and dining experiences' here.

Shopping, leisure and dining experiences in Gippsland

Greater Importance & Worse Experiences

28% of residents selected ‘A diverse range of shopping, leisure and dining experiences’ as an important attribute when considering what makes somewhere a good place to live, making it the 7th most important liveability aspect for Gippsland residents overall. Residents rated their experience of ‘A diverse range of shopping, leisure and dining experiences’ in their local area 4.9 out of 10, on average, making it the 14th most positively experienced attribute of 16. In comparison to Australia: 2024, residents of Gippsland reported worse local area experiences for Shopping, leisure and dining experiences.

Benchmarks

Importance
Experience
Gippsland
28%
4.9
Australia: 2024
28%
6.5
Regional Australia: 2024
26%
5.4
Victoria: 2024
27%
6.7
Greater Melbourne: 2024
28%
7.2

Local areas

Importance
Experience
Gippsland
28%
4.9
Wellington (n = 448)
22%
4.6
Latrobe (n = 854)
30%
5.3
Baw Baw (n = 674)
28%
5.0
Bass Coast (n = 570)
34%
5.0
South Gippsland (n = 492)
26%
4.4
East Gippsland (n = 620)
23%
4.5

Gender

Importance
Experience
Gippsland
28%
4.9
Man or Male (n = 695)
28%
5.1
Woman or Female (n = 1059)
28%
4.8
Non-binary (n = 16)
31%
4.2
Prefer not to answer (n = 43)
30%
3.7

Age

Importance
Experience
Gippsland
28%
4.9
18 - 34 (n = 482)
33%
4.6
35 - 59 (n = 617)
24%
4.6
60 + (n = 727)
27%
5.2

Significantly higher
Significantly lower