Sign in
Wingecarribee Shire community views

Reliable and efficient public transport

Billions are spent each year designing, delivering and maintaining our public transport infrastructure. And with good reason too, as one’s ability to access 'reliable and efficient public transport' provides a way for us to connect with work, education, social opportunities and other critical services that make for a good life. It also plays a crucial role in managing population change. While often considered among the top attributes that Australians believe makes somewhere a good place, residents of inner-city and middle suburban areas tend to place a higher premium on the provision of 'reliable and efficient public transport'.

Reliable & efficient public transport in Wingecarribee Shire in 2024

27% of residents selected ‘Reliable and efficient public transport’ as an important attribute when considering what makes somewhere a good place to live, making it the 9th most important liveability aspect for Wingecarribee Shire residents overall. Residents rated their experience of ‘Reliable and efficient public transport’ in their local area 3.6 out of 10, on average, making it the 16th most positively experienced attribute of 16. In comparison to Australia, residents of Wingecarribee Shire placed less importance on Reliable & efficient public transport and reported worse local area experiences.

Benchmarks

Importance
Experience
Wingecarribee Shire 2024
27%
3.6
Australia
39%
5.5
New South Wales
46%
5.6
Regional Australia
19%
3.8
Southern NSW
22%
3.7

Local Area

Importance
Experience
Wingecarribee Shire
27%
3.6
Bowral and Burradoo (n = 225)
28%
3.9
East Villages (n = 99)
24%
2.2
Mittagong District (n = 172)
24%
3.8
Moss Vale (n = 155)
23%
4.1
North Villages (n = 143)
30%
3.7
South Villages (n = 124)
39%
3.2
West Villages (n = 46)
15%
3.5

Gender

Importance
Experience
Wingecarribee Shire
27%
3.6
Male (n = 298)
26%
3.8
Female (n = 636)
28%
3.6
Prefer not to answer (n = 19)
37%
2.4

Age

Importance
Experience
Wingecarribee Shire
27%
3.6
18 - 34 (n = 79)
23%
3.5
35 - 59 (n = 373)
25%
3.4
60 + (n = 483)
30%
3.8

Significantly higher
Significantly lower