Sign in

A diverse range of shopping, leisure and dining experiences

Understanding the relative value your community places on 'a diverse range of shopping, leisure and dining experiences' and how they experience this attribute in their local area is important to understand the role, function and future of our places. With forecasts predicting growth in hospitality related occupations, and disruptions to the retail sector changing consumer habits, keeping a pulse on how the community views this topic in their local area serves an important role in planning and advocacy. Read more about .id's views on the importance of 'a diverse range of shopping, leisure and dining experiences' here.

Shopping, leisure and dining experiences in Clarence Valley Council

Greater Importance & Worse Experiences

30% of residents selected ‘A diverse range of shopping, leisure and dining experiences’ as an important attribute when considering what makes somewhere a good place to live, making it the 7th most important liveability aspect for Clarence Valley Council residents overall. Residents rated their experience of ‘A diverse range of shopping, leisure and dining experiences’ in their local area 5.1 out of 10, on average, making it the 12th most positively experienced attribute of 16. In comparison to Australia: 2024, residents of Clarence Valley Council reported worse local area experiences for Shopping, leisure and dining experiences.

Benchmarks

Importance
Experience
Clarence Valley Council
30%
5.1
Australia: 2024
28%
6.5
New South Wales: 2024
31%
6.5
Northern NSW: 2024
26%
5.5
Regional Australia: 2024
26%
5.4

Local areas

Importance
Experience
Clarence Valley Council
30%
5.1
Area A (n = 218)
32%
5.2
Area B (n = 52)
29%
5.1
Area C (n = 141)
23%
4.9
Area D (n = 115)
35%
5.0

Gender

Importance
Experience
Clarence Valley Council
30%
5.1
Male (n = 150)
32%
4.8
Female (n = 358)
29%
5.3
Other (n = 14)
22%
3.6

Age

Importance
Experience
Clarence Valley Council
30%
5.1
18 - 34 (n = 50)
30%
5.0
35 - 59 (n = 134)
28%
4.9
60 + (n = 319)
32%
5.3

Significantly higher
Significantly lower